Legal Opinion

In Re Pennsylvania Congressional Districts Reapportionment Cases

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 1982No. Civ. A. 82-0197PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

This case presents us with the decennial issue of reapportionment. The plaintiffs challenge Act 42, which was enacted by the Pennsylvania General Assembly to reapportion the state’s congressional districts in accordance with data derived from the 1980 census. The question before us is whether the evidence adduced requires us to tread our way through the political thicket or whether the facts permit us to exercise judicial restraint and stop at the edge. Although precise numerical equality was not achieved for each district, we conclude that there was sufficient…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hastert v. State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  2. Major v. TreenDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1983
  3. Mellow v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Karcher, Speaker, New Jersey Assembly, Et Al. v. Daggett Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Karcher, Speaker, New Jersey Assembly, Et Al. v. Daggett Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API