Sargent Construction Company, Inc. v. State Auto Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KYLE, District Judge.
Sargent Construction Company (“Sargent”) appeals the district court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of State Auto Insurance Company (“State Auto”). Sargent contends that the district court erred in determining that the definition of “pollutant” in the Commercial General Liability policy was unambiguous. We reverse and remand.
Background
On January 3, 1992, Sargent was engaged in a construction project for its client, Town and Country Supermarkets (“T & C”), at a T & C location in Piggott, Arkansas. As part of the project, Sargent needed to level a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rodriguez v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Krombach v. Mayflower Ins. Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- UNITED STATES of America, Ex Rel. Charles H. GLASS, Appellant, v. MEDTRONIC, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Peters v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Barbara McLaughlin v. Esselte Pendaflex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Deni Associates of Florida, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Sullins v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Western Alliance Insurance v. GillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Hastings Mutual Insurance v. Safety King, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.