Legal Opinion
McComb v. Edward S. Wagner Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 25, 1950No. Civ. No. 8847PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, District Judge.
This is a suit for a permanent injunction. The defendants are charged with violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.
Some explanation ought to be made of the condition of the record of the trial. At preliminary discussions between counsel *305and the court it seemed to be obvious that the underlying facts were substantially undisputed. Depositions had been taken in the case, and a good deal of documentary evidence collected. But at the time of the trial, I thought, and I still think, that it was perfectly possible for counsel to stipulate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Walling v. American Needlecrafts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Bowman v. Pace Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mitchell v. NutterDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1958
- Mitchell v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1959
- Durkin v. Edward S. Wagner Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1953
- Mitchell v. Northwestern Kite Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1955