Legal Opinion
Nicolet Law Office S.C. v. Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 10, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00654Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN NICOLET LAW OFFICE S.C., OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, v. 22-cv-654-slc BYE, GOFF & ROHDE, LTD. and SAINT PAUL AGENCY, LLC, Defendants. In this civil action for damages and injunctive relief, plaintiff Nicolet Law Office S.C. alleges that defendant Bye, Goff & Rohde, Ltd. (“BGR”) and its advertising agent, Saint Paul Agency, LLC, violated the Lanham Act and Wisconsin law when it copied Nicolet’s mark into the headlines of Google Ads promoting BGR’s legal services. Before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss under…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Margaret E. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.