Legal Opinion

Collision Center Paint & Body, Inc. v. Campbell

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided May 2, 1989No. 05-88-00178-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Justice.

This is a dispute between a recorded lienholder on a certificate of automobile title, appellee James Campbell doing business as E-Z Ride Auto Sales (Lienholder), and a possessory lienholder, appellant Collision Center Paint and Body (Repairman). The trial court entered a judgment non obstante veredicto, concluding that Repairman was entitled to recover only the amount specified in a statutory worker’s lien notice and ordering Repairman to return possession of the automobile to Lien-holder. For the reasons recited below, we agree with the trial court’s action and affirm the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Houston First American Savings v. MusickTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hurlbut v. Gulf Atlantic Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Exxon Corp. v. QuinnTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Baucum v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Oyster Creek Financial Corp. v. Richwood Investments II, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  2. Elite Towing, Inc. v. LSI Financial Group, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  3. Wisner v. Vandelay Invs., L.L.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Baker v. International Record Syndicate, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  5. Wisner v. Vandelay InvestmentsNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API