Legal Opinion

Puffenbarger v. Charter

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1932No. 7387 No. 7393PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatoher, President:

In each of these proceedings the ward of the guardian was a beneficiary of a U. S. soldier who died in service during the World War; compensation for the ward was paid to the guardian by the U. S. Government; the guardian deposited the payment in a State bank which has since become insolvent; and the guardian asks now that this deposit be treated as a preferred claim against the bank.

The position of each petitioner is that when he accepted the payment for his ward, he then became the agent — “a trustee or depositary” — of the federal government, and that while the money…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. State ex rel. Smith v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Manning v. SprySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. State ex rel. Spillman v. First State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Spicer v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Bagnall v. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Johnson v. Board of County CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Henderson v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API