Legal Opinion
Lloyd v. S. S. Kresge Co.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided August 16, 1978No. 77-359PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoser, J.
The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
The Supreme Court of Wisconsin has repeatedly stated the methodology which should be employed by the courts in determining whether the case before them should be disposed of by summary judgment procedure.
“. . . That ‘precise methodology’ has been set out in Marshall v. Miles (1972), 54 Wis.2d 155, 160, 161, 194 N.W.2d 630, ... as follows:
“ ‘Summary judgment is a drastic remedy that should not be granted where material evidentiary facts are in dispute, or, where…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- A. E. Investment Corp. v. Link Builders, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Antoniewicz v. ReszczynskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Rieck v. Medical Protective Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rockweit v. SenecalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Sidney Lundy Claire Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc., T/a Trop World, Defendant/third Party v. Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, Individually Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, a Professional Association, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Hovermale v. Berkeley Springs Moose Lodge No. 1483West Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- Winslow v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Losinski v. County of TrempealeauCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.