Legal Opinion
State v. Murrell
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 2002No. 00-1757PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
This case requires us to consider the allowable scope of an automobile search incident to the arrest of an occupant of the vehicle. For the reasons that follow, we overrule this court’s decision in State v. Brown (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 349, 588 N.E.2d 113, and therefore affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
I
Facts and Procedural History
On September 15, 1999, a Cincinnati police officer stopped an automobile driven by defendant-appellant, Marvin Murrell, on a street with a posted speed limit of thirty-five miles per hour after the officer’s laser device registered appellant’s speed at…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Knowles v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. FarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. EckelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- State v. Buckner, 21892 (8-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. McClellanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. MurrellOhio Supreme Court · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.