Legal Opinion

State v. Murrell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2002No. 2000-1757PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 489.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MURRELL, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Murrell,

2002-Ohio-1483.] Criminal law—Search and seizure—When police officer has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile, the officer may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the passenger compartment of that automobile. (No. 00-1757—Submitted October 17, 2001 at the Greene County Session— Decided April 3, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-000103. __________________…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. Buckner, 21892 (8-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. McClellanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State v. Schultz, Unpublished Decision (1-28-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Morrison v. Horseshoe CasinoOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. Williams, 22924 (4-3-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API