United States v. Carlin
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8287 (T. D. 38135). [Oral argument Eeb. 27, 1920, by Mr. Baldwin and Mr. Puclchafer.]
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge
The facts in this case are in all substantial respects the same as those recited in the opinion by my brother Smith in the case of United States v. John Reid & Co., decided concurrently with the present case. It is therefore unnecessary to repeat the statement of facts or the arguments sustaining the conclusions in that case. As, however, the brief in the present case lays peculiar stress on the opinion of Attorney General Wickersham in Twenty-seventh Opinions Attorney General, page 228, it seems appropriate to make clear the distinction between the question there discussed and that presented…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Columbia Shipbuilding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- National Tube Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Todd Shipyard Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921