Legal Opinion

Todd Shipyard Corp. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 4, 1921No. 2074PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 43853. [Oral argument Jan. 21,1921, by Mr. Place and Mr. Hanson ]

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The single question necessary of decision here is whether or not two articles of merchandise, denominated in the record as “two marine surface condensers,” are dutiable as assessed under paragraph 167 of the act of 1913 as manufactures of metal, or are entitled to free entry under subsection 5, paragraph J, section IV of the same act, which we quote:

That all materials of foreign production which may be necessary for the construction of naval vessels or other vessels of the United States, vessels built in the United States for foreign account and ownership, or for the purpose of being employed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. HannevigCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. United States v. Reid & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  3. United States v. CarlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Moore & McCormack Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Platt & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API