Legal Opinion

Sheffer v. Rudnick

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 24, 1935PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of tort for alleged deceit in the sale of real estate. No question of pleading is raised. The record contains substantially all the evidence in. the *206case. At the close of the evidence the defendant made a written motion for a directed verdict which the judge then refused to allow, stating that, in the event of a verdict being returned for the plaintiff, he would reserve leave to enter a verdict for the defendant on the defendant’s motion. The case was submitted to the jury with instructions to which no exception was taken, and the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Whiting v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. David v. ParkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. McKinley v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Safford v. GroutMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  5. Baker v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Passatempo v. McMenimenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. Levy v. BendetsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  3. Boston Five Cents Savings Bank v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Solomon v. BirgerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  5. Kabatchnick v. Hanover-Elm Building Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API