Legal Opinion
Solomon v. Birger
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided April 22, 1985PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*635Kass, J.
By complaint filed August 7,1979, Mark Solomon and Pauline Solomon (the “buyers”) alleged that on December 9, 1968, i.e., eleven years previously, Marvin Birger and Eleanor Birger (the “sellers”) had induced them through misrepresentation to buy a defective house. A Superior Court judge entered summary judgment in favor of the defendant sellers.3 This appeal followed. The basis urged by the defendants in favor of summary judgment was that the plaintiffs’ action was long time-barred.
We summarize certain undisputed facts which we are able to deduce from a mass of affidavits, answers to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Klein v. CatalanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Nei v. BurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Friedman v. JablonskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Crowder v. VandendealeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,310 Joseph L. Maggio v. Gerard Freezer & Ice Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Royal Business Group, Inc. v. Realist, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Greenery Rehabilitation Group, Inc. v. AntaramianMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- Passatempo v. McMenimenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- United States v. President and Fellows of Harvard CollegeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.