Legal Opinion

Matter of Keenholts v. Bayer Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon appeal to the Appellate Division the parties stipulated “ That the issue on this appeal is whether a schedule award under Par. (E), Sub-div. 3 of Sec. 15, W. C. L., made for the loss of claimant’s left eye is payable to the widow of the deceased claimant in addition to the death benefits provided for in SecM.6, W. C. L., where death resulted from the injuries.’"

The Appellate Division apparently accepted the statement of the stipulation that the award had in fact been made, and held that it was payable to the widow in addition to death benefits. The parties have taken this to mean that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Hughes v. Trustees of St. Patrick's CathedralNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Claim of Sienko v. Bopp & MorgensternNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zechmann v. Canisteo Volunteer Fire DepartmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Claim of Riley v. Syracuse UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Claim of Manning v. Stroh & Wilson, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Medress v. Bond Clothes Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Claim of De Santis v. FolcaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API