Legal Opinion
Claim of Sienko v. Bopp & Morgenstern
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 1, 1928PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
This appeal requires the interpretation of section 33 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67), which reads:
“ In case of the death of an injured employee to whom there was due at the time of bis, or her death any com pensation under the provisions of this chapter, the amount of such compensation shall be payable to the surviving wife or husband, if there be one, or, if none, to the surviving child or children of the deceased under the age of eighteen years, and if there be no surviving wife or children, then to the dependents of such deceased employee or to any of them as the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claim of Hughes v. Trustees of St. Patrick's CathedralNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Claim of McKee v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Matter of McKee v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
3Cited by13 opinions
- Matter of Green v. Dutchess County BOCESAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Matter of Keenholts v. Bayer Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Claim of Riley v. Syracuse UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Claim of Manning v. Stroh & Wilson, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Spencer-Kellogg & Sons, Inc. v. WillardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.