Legal Opinion

Suggs v. Whitaker

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1993No. 2:92CV00193PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ELIASON, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiffs have filed a motion to compel the Whitaker defendants and the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (hereinafter denominated “the insurance company”) to produce recorded statements of Julia W. Whitaker and Alford T. Thompson taken by the insurance company’s investigator shortly after an automobile accident. The insurance company insures defendant Julia Whitaker and her parents. It contends that the reports constitute protected work product material prepared in anticipation of litigation and shielded from disclosure by the provisions…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Murray Sheet Metal Company, Incorporated, and Arkwright Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  4. Thomas Organ Co. v. Jadranska Slobodna PlovidbaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
  5. Pete Rinaldi's Fast Foods, Inc. v. Great American Insurance CompaniesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Evans v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Neuberger Berman Real Estate Income Fund, Inc. v. Lola Brown Trust No. 1BDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  3. Wellin v. WellinDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
  4. Kidwiler v. Progressive Paloverde InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2000
  5. Infosystems, Inc. v. Ceridian Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API