Legal Opinion

Cordero v. Coinbase, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 5, 2025No. 3:25-cv-04024Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 RYAN CORDERO ET AL., Case No. 3:25-cv-04024-CRB 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 10 v. COMPEL ARBITRATION 11 COINBASE, INC., 12 Defendant. 13 Defendant Coinbase, Inc. moves to compel arbitration in a class action alleging that 14 it charged customers hidden fees during cryptocurrency transactions. Plaintiffs argue that 15 Coinbase’s arbitration agreement, which they assented to, contains an unconscionable class 16 waiver and cannot be enforced. Their primary argument, which relies on the 2005 17…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API