Legal Opinion

Dowd-Feder Co. v. Truesdell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1934No. 2395PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*649OPINION

By BARNES, J.

• In the trial before the court and jury the defendant presented no testimony except one witness, and this was expert testimony of a physician who examined the plaintiff a short time before the trial and went exclusively to the question of permanency of injuries claimed.

The petition in error sets out thirteen separate specifications of error. Some of these specifications are not referred to in the briefs, and others are grouped.

On page 2 of the reply brief of plaintiff in error the classification of claimed errors is set forth as follows:

1. The agency of the driver;

2.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stone v. Travelers InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Decker v. HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wills Ex Rel. Wills v. Townes Cadillac-Oldsmobile, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  2. Senn, Admx. v. LacknerOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Arthurs v. Citizens' Coal Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. House v. Stark Iron & Metal Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Senn, Admx. v. LacknerOhio Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API