Legal Opinion

Purpura v. Does Members of the Inmate Classification Committee

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 11, 2020No. 3:20-cv-01688Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 FRANK PURPURA, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01688-JAH-BGS 10 CDCR #V-66470, ORDER: 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 13 [ECF No. 2]; and 14 DOES MEMBERS OF THE INMATE CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE, 2) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL 15 Defendants. TO EFFECT SERVICE UPON 16 DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND Fed. R. Civ. P. 17 4(c)(3) 18 19 Frank Purpura (“Plaintiff”), represented by counsel, and currently incarcerated at the 20 Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, has filed a Complaint…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Andrews v. CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API