Legal Opinion
State v. Bruch
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 1997No. NonePublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
[¶ 1] Bruch appeals from a circuit court order affirming the magistrate court’s order denying his motion to declare his February 24,1993 DUI conviction invalid. We reverse.
FACTS
[¶ 2] Bruch was arrested for DUI on August 6, 1992. Bruch retained Roger Tellin-ghuisen as his attorney. Following a preliminary hearing, Bruch waived the 180-day rule, SDCL 23A-44-5.1, and trial was set for February 24,1993.
[¶ 3] On the morning of trial, Tellinghuisen told the magistrate judge that Bruch contacted him the night before, discussed the case to be presented, and told Tellinghuisen that he wished to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patterson v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Jackie McLeodCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Hiram Eugene Meyer v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Arkansas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Jack WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of Social ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. CraigSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. HaganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HirningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. PattenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.