Legal Opinion
United Concrete & Construction, Inc. v. Red-D-Mix Concrete, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided July 12, 2013No. 2011AP001566PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMichael J. Gableman, J.
¶ 1. There are many vagaries in the law. However, we deal here with the concrete. Specifically, certain batches of concrete that United Concrete and Construction, Inc. (United) purchased from Red-D-Mix Concrete, Inc. (Red-D-Mix) and now complains were defective. United used the concrete to pour outdoor installations (known in the industry as "flatwork") at various properties. After problems arose with the installations, United obtained assignments from a number of the property owners,1 who transferred their putative right to sue Red-D-Mix over to United. United then exercised that right,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office SolutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Grams v. BossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Kraemer Bros. v. United States Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Snyder v. FARNAM COMPANIES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Golden Gate Nat'l Senior Care LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- CMFG Life Insurance Company v. RBS Securities, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Aristo Vojdani v. Pharmasan Labs, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.