Legal Opinion

People v. Alston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 20, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

As argued by the defendant and conceded by the People, the trial court erred by permitting the prosecutor, over the defendant’s objection, to impeach one of his own witnesses in violation of CPL 60.35 (see, People v Fitzpatrick, 40 NY2d 44; People v Knatz, 76 AD2d 889). Moreover, we agree with the defendant’s further contention that the prosecutor was improperly permitted, over the defendant’s objection, to attack his credibility by recalling a witness, on rebuttal, who merely repeated certain testimony he had given on the People’s direct case (see, People v McRoy, 121 AD2d 566, 569; cf.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. FitzpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. SaezNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. KnatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SulayaoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. People v. KendallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. EnglishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API