Legal Opinion

Bradshaw v. Johanns

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 5, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2004-1422PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Rodney Bradshaw claims that the Farm Service Agency (“FSA”) discrimmated against him on the basis of race in connection with his efforts to obtain farm loans, in violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1691 et seq. The United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) has filed a motion for summary judgment, which is now before the Court. Upon consideration of the arguments made by the parties in their papers and in open court, as well as the relevant legal authorities and the entire record in this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bean v. PerdueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Bradshaw v. PerdueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Bean v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  4. Bradshaw v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  5. Bradshaw v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API