Legal Opinion
Delahunt v. City of Oswego
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 22, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs to plaintiff. Memorandum: We conclude, albeit for different reasons, that Supreme Court properly granted the petition and directed respondent to provide petitioner with General Municipal Law § 207-a benefits. Because the Comptroller granted petitioner’s application for performance of duty disability retirement, it was improper for respondent to deny the application of petitioner for disability benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-a (2) on the ground that he was not permanently disabled as a result of his performance of duties as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crawford v. Sheriff's DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Putnam v. City of WatertownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Maresco v. RozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Fedorczak v. DolceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Pidel v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Furch v. BucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Furch v. BucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998