Harris Bros. v. Reynolds
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Burleigh count}'’; Winchester, J. Action -by Simon Harris and Lyman Llarris, doing business as Harris Bros., agailnst Jesse Reynolds. Judgment for defendant,, and plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtFisk, J.
The order appealed from in this case was clearly correct, and must be affirmed. The appellants, who are in the real estate business in the city of Bismarck, seek to recover from respondent the sum of $540 and interest, which sum they claim to be due them as commissions for finding a purchaser for certain real property owned by respondent, near said city, pursuant to the terms of a contract claimed to exist between them. Defendant by his answer put in issue the existence of any such contract. The case was tried to a jury, and at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence the trial court, on motion of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Weaver v. BurrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
- Tilley v. County of CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Niles v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Gilbert v. BaxterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Sawyer v. BrossartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Anderson v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Beiseker v. AmbersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- McKeon v. TylerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Reeve v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.