Legal Opinion

Cross v. Herman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 10, 1906No. 14,612PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Finney district court; William Easton Hutchison, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Graves, J.:

This is an action of ejectment. The plaintiff in error owns the original, or patent, title to the land in controversy, and to recover possession thereof he commenced this action in the district court of Finney county, on October 9, 190B.

*555The defendants were in possession of the land, claiming to be the owners thereof by virtue of two tax deeds. The first of these tax deeds, in point of time, was executed to D. W. Herman and J. W. Herman, jointly, on August 3, 1897, and was recorded August 5, 1897. The plaintiff contends that this deed is void…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hall's Heirs v. DodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Penrose v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Cartwright v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  4. Dodge v. EmmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  5. Fluker v. Emporia City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. DanleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Carson v. PlattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Tucker v. ShorbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Williams v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API