Legal Opinion

Hillhouse v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1931No. 21306PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, P.

J. 1. While it is true that an action for the purchase-price of goods can not be altogether defeated by a plea of total failure of consideration, unless the evidence shows that they were totally worthless for any purpose (Felder v. Neeves, 36 Ga. App. 41, 135 S. E. 219, and cit.), still, where a contract is entered into by which one of the parties agrees to furnish material and do certain construction work in a workmanlike manner, the undertaking is an entire one (Hunnicutt & Bellingrath Co. v. Van Hoose, 111 Ga. 518, 36 S. E. 669; Chamberlin v. Booth, 135 Ga. 719, 720, 70 S. E.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doster v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
  2. Dolan v. LifseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Hunnicutt & Bellingrath Co. v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Bandy Bros. v. Frierson's SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  5. Chamberlin v. Booth & McLeroySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. IDS HOMES CORPORATION v. LucasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API