Legal Opinion
J. Robert Bonnar v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 19, 1971No. 293-63PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DURFEE, Judge*
Plaintiffs, as citizens of the United States, are former stockholders or successors in interest to former stockholders of the General Dyestuff Corporation of New York (GDC). In 1942, during the war with Germany, the stock of this company was vested or seized by the Alien Property Custodian 1 of the United States under the Trading With the Enemy Act § 1 et seq. (1964).
Under the Trading With the Enemy Act, the U. S. Alien Property Custodian (APC) in 1942 also vested title in the stock of General Aniline & Film Corporation (GAF), another American company engaged in the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Central Union Trust Co. of NY v. GarvanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Stoehr v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Mescalero Apache TribeUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Major Coat Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- L. D. Hilliard v. Dr. George J. BetoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Mar-Pak Corp.United States Court of Claims · 1973
- Alder v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.