Legal Opinion

Kazama v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1935No. Civ. No. 10051PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J., pro tem.

Appellant, who petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandate to compel a judge of the municipal court to settle a statement on appeal in a criminal ease, by the allegations of his petition, made out the following case: He had been convicted of a misdemeanor and sentenced; he gave oral notice of appeal and also written notice, and within five days thereafter filed a statement on appeal, attached to which was a transcript of the evidence given at the trial, and he duly served a copy of the statement upon plaintiff’s counsel, the city attorney, which copy was defective…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Keaton v. Mun. Court of L.A.California Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Appellate Department of Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. People v. CarpenterAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API