Legal Opinion

Boyer v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 23, 1935No. 17179Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

In his motion for rehearing *79appellant renews his claim that the record fails to show compliance with arts. 319 and 324, C. C. P. Art. 319 declares in substance that before seizing the property one having a search warrant shall give notice of his purpose in executing the warrant to the person in charge or possession of the place described in the warrant. Article 324 requires the officer executing the search warrant to make return in writing showing his execution of the warrant with an inventory of the property seized. The testimony of one of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API