Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Martin

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 8, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00089Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON Daniel Stewart, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Case No. 3:21-cv-89 : v. : Judge Thomas M. Rose : David W. Martin, et al., : : Defendants. : ______________________________________________________________________________ ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF PLAINTIFFS DANIEL STEWART AND RACHEL KOSOFF (DOC. NO. 63); DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 67); AND GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, DEFENDANTS BETSY MARTIN-SMITH, JANET BERTOLINO, JESSICA…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API