Dawson v. Carstens

In an action to quiet title to a certain tract of land, brought by respondents, Charles Dawson and wife, against appellants, Thomas Carstens and wife, the decree of the court included a small tract which appellants claim was not involved in the controversy. This tract was used by appellants as a right of way from their land to the public highway; an easement thereover having formerly been granted to their predecessor in interest by one Vaet'h, the record holder of the title. The appellants, claiming that this right of way parcel was erroneously included in the decree of the court quieting…