Legal Opinion

Westlands Water District v. Patterson

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 23, 1994No. CV-F-94-5217 OWW DLBPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

WANGER, District Judge.

I

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Westlands Water District and San Benito Water District seek a preliminary injunction to enjoin 1994 water allocations under decisions made by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (“Bureau”) and to compel “equitable apportionment” among other water districts. The motion is opposed by the Federal Defendants and defendants-in-intervention San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors,1 the Friant Power Authority,2 and certain members of the Friant Water Users Authority.3

The status of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Stanley v. University of Southern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Westlands Water District v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
  2. Westlands Water District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Friant Water Authority v. JewellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
  4. Westlands Water District v. PattersonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1995
  5. Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API