Legal Opinion
P. Sanford Ross, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 23, 1915No. 30808PublishedCited by 3 opinions
The Reporter’s statement of the case:
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, Judge
The claimant entered into a contract with the United States for dredging earth and rock and constructing jetties in James Eiver, Ya. A copy of the contract and specifications forming part thereof are attached to the petition as Exhibit A.
The description of the work to be done was stated in paragraphs 18, 19, and 20 of the specifications as follows:
“ 18. Work to be done: The work to be done under these specifications consists in excavating and removing material from portions of the channel of the James Eiver; towing the material and disposing of it by casting it overboard, conveying it ashore,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brawley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- District of Columbia v. GallaherSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964
- Loftis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948