Legal Opinion

Rondina v. Feigenbaum

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 25, 2021No. 3:19-cv-01699Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT RYAN RONDINA ) 3:19-CV-01699 (KAD) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) RICHARD FEIGENBAUM ) Defendant. ) JANUARY 25, 2021 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 22 Kari A. Dooley, United States District Judge: This case arises out of the administration of various testamentary trusts established by Grantor Herman Abbott for the benefit of, at least initially, his two daughters. Plaintiff, Ryan Rondina (“Rondina”), the Grantor’s grandson, claims an interest in two of the trusts set up for the benefit of his aunt, Ellen Taub…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API