Scalzo v. Family Creamery Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStarr, J.
This case involves the application, by analogy, of the six-year statute of limitations (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13976, as amended by Act No. 72, Pub. Acts 1941 [Comp. Laws Supp. 1943,. § 13976, Stat. Ann. 1943 Cum. Supp. §27.605]) to plaintiff’s claim for workmen’s compensation. Such statute provides in part:
“All actions in any of the courts of this State shall be commenced within six years next after the causes of action shall accrue, and not afterward.”
On June 17, 1927, plaintiff sustained injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment and in pursuance of agreement was paid…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hajduk v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Buzzn v. Muncey Cartage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Weaver v. Antrim Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Sweet v. Eddy Paper Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Hurst v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by6 opinions
- Autio v. Proksch Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Tarnow v. Railway Express AgencyMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Malleis v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Autio v. Proksch Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Wilson v. Doehler-Jarvis Division of National Lead Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.