Legal Opinion
United States v. 39 CASES, MORE OR LESS, ETC.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 14, 1961No. Civ. A. 20215PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN, Chief Judge.
The claimant has filed this motion for partial summary judgment on the ground that the seized “Michigan Brand Korleen Tablets” were not shipped in interstate commerce or held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce and consequently are not subject to the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq.
The Government, in the libel of information, alleged that the Korleen Tablets were misbranded while being held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce. 21 U.S.C.A. § 334(a). The Tablets are manufactured in Michigan for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kordel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. UrbuteitSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. 46 CARTONS, ETC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
- United States v. an Article or Device Consisting of 31 UnitsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1959
- United States v. 40 CasesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1960
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Dianovin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- William L. Palmer, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Kenneth M. Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. 14 CASES, ETC.,(BAG)" NAREMCO MEDI-MATICDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1974
- United States v. 40 Cases, More or Less OfCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.