Legal Opinion

State v. Jansen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 12, 2014No. 10CR1169FE, 11CR1916FE; A150678, A150697Published

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of possession of heroin, ORS 475.854, based on evidence discovered in a zippered pouch that police opened during an inventory at the Douglas County Jail. On appeal, defendant argues that the court erred in denying her motion to suppress that evidence because the jail’s inventory policy, which gives officers unbridled discretion to open closed containers, is unconstitutional. See State v. Atkinson, 298 Or 1, 10, 688 P2d 832 (1984) (a constitutionally permissible inventory must be conducted “pursuant to a properly authorized administrative program, designed and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. CordovaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API