Legal Opinion

In re Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 5, 2014No. Nos. 2014-127, 2014-128, 2014-129PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*586ON PETITION

ORDER

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

These petitions for writs of mandamus arise out of ongoing inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”). Broadcom Corp. brought the petitions challenging three of Telefonaktiebolaget L.M. Ericsson (“Ericsson”)’s U.S. patents. Ericsson moved for additional discovery concerning whether Broadcom’s petitions were barred under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) because, Ericsson asserts, Broadcom is a privy * of defendants to litigation filed more than one year before the inter partes review petitions.

In denying Ericsson’s request for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  2. Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  4. Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API