Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Puckett

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided May 30, 2024No. 3:22-cv-00624Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION BRICE JAMAR RHODES PLAINTIFF v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-CV-00624-JHM JERRY COLLINS, et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Jerry Collins (Collins) and David Puckett (Puckett) (collectively, Defendants). (DN 27). Plaintiff Brice Jamar Rhodes (Plaintiff) filed a response to the motion (DN 30), and Defendants filed a reply. (DN 31). For the following reasons, the motion for summary judgment will be granted. I. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API