Legal Opinion

Martin v. Rossignol

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 10, 1961No. [No. 272, September Term, 1960.]PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

This appeal is from a judgment for the plaintiff entered by the court, sitting without a jury, in a suit filed by a police officer and the insurance carrier under Workmen’s Compensation. The plaintiff was seriously and permanently injured in line of duty while pursuing a motorist, James Kenneth Martin, who was driving a Mercury owned by his father. The appellant raised only two issues on appeal, whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a continuance, and whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. On the latter question we ordered…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Plank v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  2. McKay v. HargisMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. City of Kalamazoo v. PriestMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Thanos v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. Fire Insurance Salvage CorpsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Saarinen v. KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Boyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Buck v. Cam's Broadloom Rugs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Day v. State Ex Rel. Utah Department of Public SafetyUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Merritt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API