Martin v. Rossignol
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.
This appeal is from a judgment for the plaintiff entered by the court, sitting without a jury, in a suit filed by a police officer and the insurance carrier under Workmen’s Compensation. The plaintiff was seriously and permanently injured in line of duty while pursuing a motorist, James Kenneth Martin, who was driving a Mercury owned by his father. The appellant raised only two issues on appeal, whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a continuance, and whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. On the latter question we ordered…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Plank v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- McKay v. HargisMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- City of Kalamazoo v. PriestMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Thanos v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Mayor of Baltimore v. Fire Insurance Salvage CorpsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Saarinen v. KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Boyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Buck v. Cam's Broadloom Rugs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Day v. State Ex Rel. Utah Department of Public SafetyUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Merritt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.