Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Murphy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 8, 1985PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The parties to this action were married on June 4, 1960. The three younger children of the marriage currently reside with defendant. There is evidence that the youngest child is subject to periodic seizures of an unspecified nature.
The trial record and the decision of Trial Term afford a sufficient basis for appellate review of that court’s determination of the issues of maintenance and child support. Based upon our assessment of the parties’ circumstances in accordance with the factors enumerated in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6) (a); (7) (a), we conclude that the trial court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sadofsky v. SadofskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Hillmann v. HillmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Antis v. AntisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Lind v. LindAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Lind v. LindNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sperling v. SperlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Rosenberg v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Culnan v. CulnanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Formato v. FormatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Reingold v. ReingoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.