Legal Opinion

Lind v. Lind

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

That court properly resolved the factual disputes before it in the causes of action for separation and divorce (see Hessen v Hessen, 33 NY2d 406, 408) and it not appearing that that court abused its discretion or committed an error of law, its determinations of alimony, counsel fees and the use of the marital property are beyond our review (see Patron v Patron, 40 NY2d 582, 585).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hessen v. HessenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Patron v. PatronNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilbur v. WilburAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Murphy v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Haymes v. HaymesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Warshaw v. WarshawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Emanuele v. EmanueleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API