Legal Opinion

Wininger v. Purdue University

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1996No. 79A04-9511-CV-460PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendant-Appellant Brett Wininger (Wininger) appeals a trial court order allowing Purdue University (Purdue) to enforce, by means of proceedings supplemental to execution or a writ of execution or garnishment, a restitution order which was part of Wininger’s sentence for Criminal Mischief, a class D felony.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Wininger raises three issues, which we restate as:

1. Whether a county court has jurisdiction to enter a restitution order in excess of $10,000.00.

2. Whether an obligation to make payments pursuant to a restitution order as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Kotsopoulos v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Muniz Etc. v. United StatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Savage v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Crawford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. HymerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. Hilliard v. JacobsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. M.M. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. HymerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API