Legal Opinion
Jabbour v. Bassatne
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 28, 1996No. 95-CV-138, 95-CV-263, 95-CV-1296PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
These appeals are from the grant of summary judgment to appellee (Bassatne 1 ) on a suit by appellant (Jabbour) for specific performance of a settlement agreement between the parties; and from the award of substantial attorney’s fees against appellant as a sanction under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 11 (1995). The trial court concluded as a matter of law that Jabbour was not entitled to specific performance because he had not furnished a real estate appraisal as required (and defined) by the agreement. The court further determined that Jabbour’s counsel had filed the lawsuit based…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Frederick Lawrence White, Jr. Benjamin L. Staponski, Jr., and Gwen G. Caranchini v. General Motors Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Broadhead v. Bonita Lakes Mall, Ltd. PartnershipMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Autozone Development Corp. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Brooks v. Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics US, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
- King Carpentry v. 1345 K Street, SE, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
- Paul Broadhead v. Bonita Lakes MallMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.