Carp v. Carp
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff in her complaint alleges three causes of action. The first cause of action is to set aside an interlocutory decree of divorce granted to August Carp, defendant herein and plaintiff in the divorce action, on the ground of ignorance of the fact that she was served with summons in such divorce action. She admits the delivery to her of the summons and copy of the complaint, but claims that “by reason of her state of mind as aforesaid plaintiff did not think of and did not recall the delivery of said paper writings upon her, as aforesaid, and did not connect the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lake v. BonyngeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- O'Rourke v. SkellengerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re Estate of KeithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by3 opinions
- Darlington v. Basalt Rock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Jackson v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Turner v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939