Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Hurst
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 9, 1942No. 15,099PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bock
This is an action in mandamus, brought by Harold Hurst, one of defendants in error, a provisional appointee in the state department of revenue, to compel the State Civil Service Commission to certify, and the state treasurer to pay, his salary as chief of staff services in the newly created department of revenue, from August 15 to August 31, 1941. The trial court ordered certification and payment. The case is here by writ of error sued out by H. Max Schmidt, plaintiff in error, who was intervener in the court below. The Civil Service Commission favored the position taken by Schmidt.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hale v. . WorstellNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Getty v. WitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
- McDevitt v. CorfmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
3Cited by4 opinions
- Colorado Ass'n of Public Employees v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Colorado Ass'n of Public Employees v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Spickard v. CIVIL SERV. COM'N OF CITY & CTY. OF DENVERColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
- Cook v. City and County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2003