Legal Opinion

City National Bank v. Hamilton

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On final hearing on bill and answer and proofs taken in open court.

1Opinion of the Court

Yan Fleet, Y. C.

This is a creditor’s suit. A part of the debt on which the judgment is founded was contracted February 25th, 1878. The balance was incurred subsequently. The conveyances, which the •complainants seek to have declared fraudulent, appear to have been signed and delivered June 1st, 1877, but were not acknowledged or recorded until January, 1878. The lands the com'plainauts are seeking to reach were conveyed to Eben G. Hamilton by deed dated January 24th, 1867, and he continued to hold the title to them until June 1st, 1877. The title on record .stood in his name until January…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sexton v. WheatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. RutzlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hollander v. AbramsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  2. Kaplan v. HeilesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  3. Peragallo v. OnetoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  4. Levi v. LeviNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  5. Smith v. SmithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API