Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Boehm, R. v. Riversource Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 2015No. 1999 WDA 2013Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY

SHOGAN, J.:

I join the Majority’s analysis and disposition of issues one through four and six. However, because I do not believe this case presents the appropriate context for application of the total offset method, I respectfully dissent on issue five.

Our Supreme Court adopted the total offset method of calculating damages in the limited context of lost future income resulting from an automobile accident. Kaczkowski v. Bolubasz, 491 Pa. 561, 421 A.2d 1027 (1980). The Kaczkowski Court addressed, inter alia, the existing law on damages, which discounted the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kaczkowski v. BolubaszSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Helpin v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Sonlin v. Abington Memorial HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API