Legal Opinion

Howell Electric Light & Power Co. v. Village of Howell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1903No. Docket No. 57PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Livingston; Smith, J. Assumpsit by the Howell Electric Light & Power Company against the village of Howell to recover for street lighting. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict •directed by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action of assumpsit brought by the plaintiff to recover the sum of $953 for *118electric lights furnished by said plaintiff to the defendant village for the months of February, March, April, May, and 13 days in June, 1901. The charge for said lights was at the rate of $215 per month.

On the 18th of August, 1890, said village passed an ordinance allowing George L. Beetle and J. H. Andrews a franchise to erect and construct an electric-light plant for the purpose of furnishing lights for the streets of said village. On August .18, 1890, said village entered into a written contract with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tallon v. Grand Portage Copper Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Sines v. Superintendents of the PoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jennings v. SouthwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Cade v. City of BelingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Iverson Industries, Inc. v. Metal Management Ohio, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
  4. Complete Medical Sales Inc v. Genoray America, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API